Ron Deibert on the Business of Cyberwarfare

By Hazlitt

ron-deibert-on-the-business-of

In this outtake from our upcoming episode of The Arcade podcast, Ron Deibert, author of Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace, talks about the big business of cyberwarfare and whether programmers should be held accountable for what they make.

A gun’s a gun. You can use it as a doorstop but basically, a gun’s a gun. A router that is used to filter internet traffic can be used to keep the internet running and keep out spam and ensure that everything is efficient. It can also be used to identify dissidents who then will be arrested and tortured and killed. That’s the difference. It’s a classic dual-use technology.”

Read our interview with Ron Deibert by Wired columnist and New York Times Magazine contributing writer Clive Thompson.

Listen to The Arcade podcast later this week for our full interview with Ron Deibert. Subscribe to The Arcade on iTunes or stream us online.

Music: Snow Wave by Alright Lover


Find Hazlitt on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter

Next

||Still Life with Turkey Pie, Pieter Claesz (1627), ||Michael Deforge via Lucky Peach
‘I Was a Directionless Acid Freak Until I Found Cooking’
Four of Hazlitt’s favourite cookbook authors talk shop. Peter Meehan, Jennifer McLagan, Naomi Duguid, and Meredith Erickson on annoying food trends, what makes a great cookbook, and how they really feel about following recipes.

Previous

Turkey is Not Tunisia, and This is Not (Exactly) the Turkish Spring
Admit it, you sort of agree with the Turkish Prime Minister when he says “we have a menace that is called Twitter… To me, social media is the worst menace to society.” Except that Recep Tayyip Erdogan isn’t complaining about selfies or Instagrammed brunches: he’s complaining because the people of Istanbul are taking to social media to spread information (inevitably, some of it false) about the police crackdown on protesters in Taksim Gezi Park over the last several days. Some people have already started calling the protests in Turkey—which have now spread to other cities, including the capital of Ankara—a “Turkish spring,” but there are a number of reasons why it’s wrong to view these demonstrations with the same goggles used for Egypt or Tunisia, much less Libya or Syria. The most obvious being that Turkey is a NATO member, and a comparatively robust democracy. The only thing Turkey has in common with Tunisia is the apparent modesty of the initial complaint: the protests in Istanbul started ostensibly over the government’s plans to tear up a public park and build a mall and government complex. Of course, scratching beneath the surface reveals the complaints against the Erdogan government, and his Justice and Development Party, are more substantial than a park. They’re also too complicated to be explained by easy analogies to the Arab Spring or the Occupy movements.